In today's politically correct (PC) world, everything is being considered for the possibility of potential criminal acts. I feel that such magic hunting is aggressive, but I would like to briefly discuss why chess games are banned as a result of scrutiny of "PC police".
First of all, let me give you a disclaimer that I am an avid chess player and that it lasts 50 years. It will certainly help to develop strategy and spiritual skills. But slowly on the cheek with reflections and tongue, I must admit that the game gives some nasty potential messages that the PC police need to carefully consider.
The most obvious problem is that chess is essentially a racist. Blacks and whites are not to be encouraged in racist cultures. And, of course, white goes first, I guess I think I'm disturbing people in color. It's like sitting behind the bus. It is another form of white hegemonism.
On the other hand, Caucasians show that whites are more aggressive than blacks first. The board is set up with all of them in order and peace at the stadium is totally done. And white people attack. every time. The message is that it is white to make you an attacker.
And invasion is an important part of chess. I tried chess on a computer and tried not to be aggressive. That was impossible. Invasion is incorporated into the game. It is a game of war and conflict. It is not a way to make peace, but to train players to look for ways to defeat opponents.
As with all wars, victims come out and usually fall down. Pawn is also the weakest part. You will think that the kingdom should protect the weakest citizens. You should not be sacrificed like a horse by feeding into war.
And that is all to defend the king. You can get all your work, but if the king is robbed, everything will be lost. Everyone including the queen is sacrificed if necessary to save the king. Of course, this unquestioned obedience to monarchs is very undemocratic and even fascist.
It is also a false opinion to assume that the Queen must die for the king. Does the King have to defend his queen? What happened to the chivalry?
Of course, the queen is more powerful than the king. Because she can move freely in any direction. The King is limited to one space at a time. He obviously has no advantage in formality or function. There is no reason for the Queen to be sacrificed for fewer kings. This is a purely paternal trap and perpetuates gender discrimination. I think the Queen must also wear bra and high heels when she turns around the board to save her unconscious husband.
Speaking of gender, what kind of sex is pox? When they reach the other side of the board, they can exchange for any work including Luke, Bishop, Knight, or the Queen. But usually they will be queen. Does this mean they are female horses? Do they receive gender reassignment when they reach the other side of the board? They seem to be sexually neutral, or at least sexually confused, until you decide what you want to be. Do you want to make wondering about gender as children playing chess go down board of their life? Do I have to tell that the Queen is better than the Queen? This kind of message of gender confusion may cause bubbling of young children.
Regarding the male role model, the king is really pathetic. It is only battle that knows how to do them. They can not stop the war fighting forever. The two kings can not approach each other. Negotiated settlements are not permitted. Each king is devoted to the Royal Narcissist who is running towards the castle to hide behind some pawns at the first moment of the threat. He is ruthless and wants everyone to die as necessary. He is selfish brute. Is this really a type of leader you'd like your boy to emulate when growing up?
Chess also promotes Christianity against other religions. Please be aware that there is only a bishop on the chess board. How is that? How about using Ayatla or a rabbit instead? Perhaps on one side there should be a rabbin and other ayatollahs. Or how about Protestant ministers and Catholic bishops? Of course, all this is unpleasant for atheists and atheists who may prefer counselors instead of bishops. What is the difference between scientists and astrologers? Clearly, diversity is needed here, Christian monopoly of bishop work is unpleasant and hatred for non-Christians. It will probably promote Islamic hatred.
How is chess affecting stupid people? The victory in chess is considered as a sign of intelligence to many people and the defeat in chess suggests that the opponent is smarter than you. This win-loss game reinforces the foolish anxiety of becoming a chess because it decides to play video games instead of always losing. Many of these video games are violent and teach violent attitudes to these absurd children.
Therefore, chess is a "gateway game" to violence. This means that foolish children playing chess will be profiled as potential criminals someday. Stupid chess players are a threat to national security, and profiling as a potential criminal is a threat to freedom. It is like a stalemate.
Today's world is different from the past world that created this chess match. We currently regard all religions as equality. We do not think that the world should be operated by a thirsty, selfish king who is thirsty, I think that the queen should be able to control without a queen. We insist on pawns making more remarks on what is going on since "Pawn Lives Matter". We do not want to call losers as losers. Because they hurt their feelings and strengthen the sense of being losers. And if the king decides to become a queen it is okay.
Obviously, chess no longer cuts it in the new PC world.
